• A Few Rules to Follow
  • Authors
  • Our Main Aspirations
  • Series Guide
  • Why “Shepherd the Sheep”?

Shepherd The Sheep

~ Three men who love Jesus and His church

Shepherd The Sheep

Category Archives: Theology

Politicizing and the Christian Life

02 Tuesday Oct 2012

Posted by Jason in Biblical Counseling, Theology

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

drama, faithfulness, Jason, life, politics, sovereignty, suffering

All of us at one point in our life will be in a position where politics affects us. Now in this political season we most naturally think Presidential election and indeed the leader of the “free” world impacts our life. However I am speaking of a different political situation. Each of us can ignore Federal and State politics if he or she chooses — even though who leads our government can impact our life.

Instead, I am speaking about the politics found in the office, kids soccer team, universities, churches, or other entities where power, influence, decision making, and your life collide. Relationships are sticky. Add sin (lusts, competing desires, or envy) to the equation and thus the reason “reality” television is such a hit. Writers thrive off this kind of drama because we love to read about it and watch it curled up on the couch with popcorn! We love drama in other people’s life. We hang on to find out if the hero we love will win the day! “Drama” is often found in our politicized life — we’ve even heard people answer, “How was your day?” with “Drama”!
Continue reading »

Why Time Heals No Wounds….Well Sorta!

17 Tuesday Jul 2012

Posted by Shawn J. Wilhite in Biblical Counseling, Preaching, Shepherding, Theology

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Biblical Counseling, Forgiveness, High Priest, New Covenant, Pastoral Ministry, Shawn, Shepherding, Sin

Within the arsenal of pastoral ministry is biblical/pastoral counseling. You’re the spiritual guru, or at least, should be. Within the pastoral endeavors, you’re bound to come across those that are spiritually lazy, faint and tender hearted, need encouragement, or those who refuse to stop drinking from the fountain of sin. Within my shepherding undertakings thus far, one of the major themes within my biblical counseling is that of broken relationships central to forgiveness.

Extending forgiveness is one those spiritual disciplines, yes I meant spiritual disciplines, that may be the easiest conceptually to see but the hardest to personalize. For example, one lady I’ve counseled communicates her longing to be forgiven by God for her sins. She comprehends the depth and extent of forgiveness that God will offer, but not it’s not for her and only for others.

Continue reading »

Why inflation may be worse than abortion

10 Tuesday Jul 2012

Posted by Jason in Theology

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Biblical Theology, economics, Jason, Minor Prophets, poor, rich

As election season approaches one common (and maybe the most common) political issue for Christians is abortion. It is as if this one issue is the deciding factor for every elected official. I get the sense with some people if abortion were outlawed involvement in politics would cease. Abortion is sin. Killing people and placing it under the banner of “human rights” is calling “dark” “light”.

Yet the levels of injustice seen in other areas of government are cause for GREAT concern. Currently the US continues to print money on demand. The effect of our continuous printing drives the value of the dollar down. Why are gas prices higher today than five years ago? Many of you will blame Obama and his lack of ordering drilling in some secret field, only Fox News knows about, that would produce enough oil for us to give to our grand-kids’ kids. But the main reason is the value of the dollar. Gas is traded internationally with the dollar. As inflation rises and the dollar devalues gas prices go up. For the rich man this hits the pocket book, but does not hurt the pocket book. For the poor family, on a tight budget, this devastates the penny purse.

Continue reading »

Limited vs Unlimited

21 Thursday Jun 2012

Posted by Jason in Theology

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Biblical Theology, Jason, limited, tension, unlimited

There are a handful of debates between polar opposite views in theology. None probably more popular than limited vs unlimited atonement. This issue has probably been discussed among every one of us who love Jesus and read His Word. In no way will I win the argument and neither will you. There is too much baggage among the debate to “win the day”! When we get to heaven, and sit in “theology 101″ we will all learn the truth :)

But until then, debates will rage, ink will spill, keyboards hammered, and late night blogger wars will ensue while our spouses sit in the other room asking if we really have to stay up late because someone is wrong on the Internet.
Continue reading »

Question on Hell

19 Tuesday Jun 2012

Posted by Jason in Theology

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

hell, Jason, question

A few friends of mine were talking about degrees of sin and hell. A simple question is posed. I am open to being wrong on this issue. Are there degrees of punishment in Hell? (Please show us from Scripture where you get your answer)

On Theologizing

09 Saturday Jun 2012

Posted by kenstiles in Theology

≈ 5 Comments

Tags

Biblical Theology, Continuity, Covenant Theology, Discontinuity, Dispensationalism, Theology

It has occurred to me that when it comes to spectrally viewing Dispensational Theology vis-á-vis Covenant Theology, as their various formulations happen to appear along the axis of continuity/discontinuity, something is left to be desired. I think this is because such a paradigm not only tends to intensify discussion along the line of continuity vs. discontinuity (which can certainly be helpful), but also tends to minimize discussion along the lines of continuity per se and discontinuity per se. Continuity vs. discontinuity does not tell the whole story.

It would also be profitable to theologize along the lines of organic continuity vs. synthetic continuity, and organic discontinuity vs. synthetic discontinuity. I use “organic” in the following sense: that which is integral, or basic, to the constitution of a thing. I use “synthetic” in the following sense: that which is contrived, or manufactured, and foreign to a thing. The “thing” I am speaking of is Scripture. So “organic continuity” is continuity which is basic to Scripture; the continuity that Scripture itself inculcates. Conversely, “synthetic continuity” is continuity that is foreign to what Scripture inculcates; rather, it is manufactured by the theologian: often as a means to give coherence to the overall structure of divine revelation. The respective categories are what are intended concerning discontinuity as well.

I am, of course, assuming there is a basic, unified structure to divine revelation. I doubt that many would object to the thought that within this basic structure of divine revelation there are mysteries, the whitespaces in Scripture. Synthetic theology is basically the attempt to fill in those whitespaces with necessary logical inferences derived from the premises of what Scripture actually communicates. These necessary logical inferences become, in the mind of the theologian, part of the unified structure of divine revelation upon which they theologize.

I am not saying, nor do I think, that what I have described is necessarily a conscious process. I doubt that any Christian theologian would intentionally put their logical inferences on par with Scripture itself; no matter how necessary those logical inferences seem to be. That said, I do think that I have accurately described what can happen in doing theology: especially when one is attempting to describe the unified structure of divine revelation.

The difficulty in doing big picture theology is that once the theologian’s inferences are unconsciously stuffed into the whitespaces of Scripture they function as a foundation upon which further theological formulations are constructed. It should not be too difficult to admit that there is a difference between using Scripture as a foundation and using such inferences a foundation for theological formulations. I think the difference is akin to the Empire State Building resting on its present foundation vs. resting on a Jell-O mold.

I suppose these pesky, little inferences affect many parts of theology. I do not believe myself immune to confusing my own inferences with Scripture, but I certainly try and keep on the lookout for them. If I find them, and I do, I do what any respectable theologian would do: I do whatever I can to hold on to them. Then, once exhausted, I toss them out. Anyway, my hope is that over the next decade (I have to leave myself some wiggle room) I will sporadically post random thoughts on organic continuity and discontinuity integral to the structure of divine revelation and synthetic continuity and discontinuity manufactured and placed in that structure by theologians.

A theological commentary on our trials.

09 Wednesday May 2012

Posted by Jason in Theology

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

ecclesiology, family, Jason, sovereignty, suffering, trials

This last weekend my third son was born (05.03.2012). Gabriel was brought into the world a week earlier than scheduled. He came early because my wife had complications. We praise God because we have been aware of the complications since January and he allowed Kyla to carry Gabriel to week 36 day 6. We also rejoice concerning the complication because it could have been worse and forced other follow up surgical procedures for Kyla.

Thursday morning, after recovery, everyone thought Kyla was out of the woods and needed rest. I was released to get coffee and breakfast. When I came back, there were 30 nurses in Kyla’s room. He blood pressure dropped due to loss of blood. An emergency response team was called out just in case. Her doctor and nurses were able to catch her and bring her blood pressure back up without her flat-lining.
Continue reading »

Peter preaches the Gospel

15 Sunday Apr 2012

Posted by Jason in Theology

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Acts 2, Gospel, Peter, Psalm 16, Sunday morning, worship

Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know— this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death. “But God raised Him up again, putting an end to the agony of death, since it was impossible for Him to be held in its power.

“For David says of Him, ‘I saw the Lord always in my presence; For He is at my right hand, so that I will not be shaken. ‘Therefore my heart was glad and my tongue exulted; Moreover my flesh also will live in hope; Because You will not abandon my soul to Hades, Nor allow Your Holy One to undergo decay. ‘You have made known to me the ways of life; You will make me full of gladness with Your presence.’

“Brethren, I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. “And so, because he was a prophet and knew that God had sworn to him with an oath to seat one of his descendants on his throne, he looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that He was neither abandoned to Hades, nor did His flesh suffer decay. “This Jesus God raised up again, to which we are all witnesses. “Therefore having been exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He has poured forth this which you both see and hear. “For it was not David who ascended into heaven, but he himself says: ‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at My right hand, Until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.” ’

“Therefore let all the house of Israel know for certain that God has made Him both Lord and Christ—this Jesus whom you crucified.”

Now when they heard this, they were pierced to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Brethren, what shall we do?”

Peter said to them, “Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. “For the promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off, as many as the Lord our God will call to Himself.” And with many other words he solemnly testified and kept on exhorting them, saying, “Be saved from this perverse generation!”

Part VI: Evaluating the Rapture

10 Tuesday Apr 2012

Posted by Shawn J. Wilhite in Eschatology, Theology

≈ Leave a Comment

Tags

Day of the Lord, eschatology, rapture

Either you have seen them in person, seen them in videos, or at least heard of them, but women, in less domesticated areas, are seen holding multiple things on their heads, shoulders, and hands while walking. What amazes me is how they do this with great balance. As seen within this series, eschatological conclusions pose great difficulty to the Bible interpreter. The problem isn’t necessarily the difficulty of Eschatology but the difficulty is holding “all the elements” in perfect balance. Moreover, other theological elements, within Scripture, are easier to comprehend because the majority of their doctrine can be located in one Testament. Eschatology, however, is found within both Testaments.

Hermeneutical presuppositions are then vital for the Eschatological positions one holds to. I tend to cling less to an Analogy of Scripture principle and tend to observe more of a true description of the Progress of Revelation. Therefore, my theological method produces results through a diachronic lens, rather than a synchronic lens. Scripture then develops its theological interpretation through time rather than appealing to the Author (God) disseminating its theology in one sitting. Moreover, this further reveals how I view the two testaments. The reader depends upon the theology of the OT to interpret the NT, not vice-versa. My understanding of the Day of the Lord will reveal how these hermeneutical presuppositions are accomplished.

Post 4 dealt with the promise to be kept from the “wrath” of God. Contextually, 1 Thess 5 defines the wrath within the idea of the Day of the Lord. That is, to not be destined for wrath is to mean exemption from the Day of the Lord. Furthermore, when you begin reading Revelation, the seals are given early on in the book. Though disputed, I would observe Rev 6 as day one of the seven-year tribulation. The first 6 seals are drastic. Those (v.16–17) on the earth will call for the rocks and mountains to fall on them in order not to see the face of the Lamb. They conclude,

for the great day of their wrath has come, and who can stand?

That is, a summary statement of wrath has come upon day one of the tribulation.

Primary thesis concerning the Day of the Lord: The Day of the Lord is an extended period of time, predominantly defined in the Old Testament, to describe a time for wrathful retribution to be placed upon the earth, a time for the salvation of Israel from foreign nations, salvation of Gentiles, the physical return of the Lord, and a time for Messianic peace, extending from day one of the tribulation to the completion of the 1000 year messianic reign.

Wrath and Retribution upon People and Creation

The wrath of God is qualitative of the Day of the Lord. The exalted Lord of Isaiah 2:6–22 has a “Day” to place Himself against everything demonstrating pride. These prideful images extended to the haughtiness of man (v.17), creations of man (v.15–16) and even to elements of creation (v.12–14). During this “Day,” people will enter into caves in attempt to hide from the terror of YHWH and splendor of His majesty. This is nearly a direct image of Rev 6.16–17 in the 6th seal.

The prophecy of Zephaniah 1:7–18 may be the most descriptive of the “Day.” Zephaniah begins by explaining the nearness of the “Day” and it is a “Day” of sacrifice and consecration of guests. It is further described in v. 15–16 as:

A day of wrath is that day, a day of distress and anguish, a day of ruin and devastation, a day of darkness and gloom, a day of clouds and thick darkness, a day of trumpet blast and battle cry against the fortified cities and against the lofty battlements.

According to Amos 5.18–27, it is not a desirable “Day.”

Woe to you who desire the day of the Lord! Why would you have the day of the Lord.

(V.18). Though this “Day,” is mostly a destructive time of God’s wrath upon people, God destroys elements of His creation to inflict the people (Ezek 7; Amos 8:9–14).

(Passages for further study: Is 2:6–22; 7:18–25; 34:8; Jer 46:10; Ezek 7; Joel 2; Amos 5:18–27, 8:9–14; Zeph 1:7–18)

Salvation of Israel and other nations

A smaller element within the “Day” is the salvation of Israel’s remnant and other foreign nations. The remnant of Israel is brought to salvation in Rev 7 (possibly near the beginning of the tribulation?). During that “Day”, there are 3 parts of people 1/3 is Assyria, 1/3 is Babylon, and 1/3 Israel. Within the historical setting of Isaiah, this would not have been pleasant for the people to hear because Babylon and Assyria have and are overtaking the nation of Israel and in the near future, Judah. However, what that “Day” will behold is the salvation of Israel and Gentiles under the title of “My people, work of My hands, and My inheritance.” Isaiah 19:24–25 states:

In that day Israel, will be the third with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth, whom the Lord of hosts has blessed, saying, ‘Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel my inheritance.’

Salvation will annul ethnic distinction and fellowship will ensue all under the hand of God.

(Passages for further study: Is 19:16–25; 27; Jer 30:1–9)

The physical Return of the Lord

As displayed in the Olivet discourse, cosmic signs will occur simultaneously with the return of the Lord. Matt 24:29–30

Immediately after the tribulation of those days the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken. Then will appear in heaven the sign of the Son of Man…

All those, upon the earth, at His return will see these cosmic signs. The “Day of the Lord” will include the coming of Christ. Joel 2:10–11 assigns the same cosmic signs to the Day of the Lord.

The earth quakes before them; the heavens tremble. The sun and the moon are darkened, and the stars withdraw their shining. The Lord utters his voice before his army, from his camp is exceedingly great; he who executes his word is powerful. For the day of the Lord is great and very awesome; who can endure it?

The prophecy of Zechariah contains the lengthiest descriptions of the Day of the Lord and attributes it to the coming return of Christ (chs. 12–14). Clearly portraying the Messiah as the coming King is 14:4, 9.

On that day his feet shall stand on the Mount of Olives that lies before Jerusalem on the east, and the Mount of Olives shall be split in two from east to west by a very wide valley, so that one half of the Mount shall move northward, and the other half southward.

And the Lord will king over all the earth. On that day the Lord will be one and his name one.

The “Day” will include the coming return of Christ as the designated Messiah.

(Passages for further study: Is. 24:21–23; 25:6–12; Joel 2:10; Zech 12–14)

Messianic Peace

The final element consisting of the “Day of the Lord” is a period of Messianic peace and blessing. Joel 3:17–21 portrays God dwelling in Zion with strangers not passing through it again. The mountains will drip with sweet wine and hills will flow with milk. Earthly provisions will flourish with abundance.

Moreover, as Amos 9:11–15 describes this “Day”, God will again raise up the “Booth of David.” Again, there is a great description of an abundance of riches being inherited by all. Wine will flow from the mountains, cities will be rebuilt, vineyards will be planted for the drinking of wine, and gardens will be planted for the consumption of fruit. And according to Acts 15, this will all happen after the Gentiles participate in the rebuilding of the Booth of David by their current salvation.

According to Isaiah 4:2–6, this “Day” will finally be the time for the righteous “Branch” to reign in full glory. The Lord will cause a canopy of glory to cover all so that there will be a cloud by day and smoke by night to give shade from the glory of God.

(Passages for further study: Is 2:1–5; 4:2–6; 11:10–11; Amos 9:11–15; Joel 3:17–21; Micah 4:1–5)

*     *     *     *     *

The OT description of the Day of the Lord contains many elements. It is no wonder when Paul mentions the Day of the Lord, he does not define it, but assumes the reader understands its OT roots. Even unbelievers recognize the tribulational wrath to be considered the “Day” (Rev 6:16–17) and with the first opening of the Seal, the “Day” begins. As Jason demonstrated in Part 4, when the “Day” finally comes, the church is not destined for wrath and will be taken prior to its appearing.

Part V: Evaluating the Rapture

07 Saturday Apr 2012

Posted by kenstiles in Eschatology, Theology

≈ 10 Comments

Tags

1 Corinthians 15, eschatology, rapture, resurrection

In part iv of this series, Jason pointed out that the various rapture views are built from drawing inferences from the biblical data. There is nothing wrong with this, unless, of course, the inferences drawn do not correspond to reality, but that’s only a problem for mid- and post-tribulation, and pre-wrath rapture views ;-) . In the same post, Jason demonstrated how drawing a few (I think solid) inferences from 1 Thessalonians leads one to a pre-trib view of the rapture. In today’s post, we look at another passage that does not teach a pre-trib rapture per se: 1 Corinthians 15. It is worth pointing out that 1 Corinthians 15 is also urged by some to completely rule out premillennialism. This contention will be touched upon below.

In 1 Corinthians 15 Paul is writing to correct some misconceptions about, and false teachings concerning, the bodily resurrection that had crept into the Corinthian church (15:12-19, 29-34). The issue is that some in that church were denying the resurrection. Paul responds that if Christ was not raised from the dead then the Christian faith is worthless, and we may as well just go party while we still can. However, Jesus was raised from the dead; and, after relating that just as all those united to Adam will die, so all those united to Christ will be made alive. Paul then explains that will be a sequence of resurrections.

The sequence of resurrections began with Jesus himself (15:23a). The next resurrection in the sequence is those who are raised at Jesus’ return (15:23b). What happens next is,

Then comes the end, when he hands over the kingdom to God the Father, when he has brought to an end all rule and all authority and power (15:24).

This is where things get interesting. Gentry (a partial preterist postmillennialist) maintains, “At his second coming history is over in that the resurrection occurs at ‘the end’; there will be no millennial age on the present earth to follow.”[1] In verse 24, cited above, it is clear that the end comes when Jesus hands the kingdom over to the Father. It is equally clear that Jesus hands over the kingdom to the Father when he has brought an end to all other rule, power, and authority. Gentry views this as happening virtually simultaneously with Jesus’ return. The difficulty for Gentry’s view (and also all other a- and post-millennial views) is the next verse:

For he must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet (15:25).

In other words, Jesus reigns for a time (here unspecified) until he has put all enemies under his feet (i.e., brings an end to all rule, power, and authority). So, for all but premillennial positions, Christ must be presently reigning and putting all his enemies under his feet. Once Jesus has accomplished this, he will return, those that belong to him will be resurrected, and he will turn the kingdom over to the Father. Again, the last three events happen virtually simultaneously. However, if this is a correct understanding of this passage, then Jesus will never actually physically rule over the nations! As soon as he returns, he delivers the kingdom to the Father. There is another approach.

I would argue that it is simply to read one’s theology into the text to make the reigning of Jesus in verse 25 precede his coming in verse 23. A more natural way of reading these three verses would be that, in the sequence of events that Paul is describing, Christ will return and those who belong to him will be resurrected, he will then reign until he has placed all his enemies under his feet, and once this is accomplished he will turn over the kingdom to the Father. What is more, since Paul is actually describing a sequence of resurrections, it would be natural to understand that in the event of Jesus handing the kingdom over to the Father another bodily resurrection is implied.

Interestingly enough, this would appear to be the same sequence of events we find described by John in Revelation 20. Except that in Revelation 20 John reveals the length of Jesus’ reign between his second coming and turning the kingdom over to the Father. John also explicitly states that there is a resurrection after the reign of Christ, whereas it is only implied by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15.

Well, ok, premillennialism is great, but what about the rapture? The rapture part comes later in the chapter. If what has been advocated so far is correct, and a pre-trib rapture position is correct, then none of what Paul has discussed so far concerning resurrections directly applies to the Corinthians. They won’t be resurrected at the second coming. They will be returning with Christ to reign with him. They certainly won’t be resurrected at the end, when Christ delivers up the kingdom to the Father (i.e., the end of the millennium). John reveals that it is unbelievers who are resurrected at this time. Incidentally, this may be one reason Paul does not explicitly mention this resurrection when he is discussing the sequence of resurrections in 1 Corinthians 15. In 1 Corinthians 15 Paul is discussing the resurrection of those who are united to Christ, not resurrection in general (which would include all believers and unbelievers alike).

Paul’s discussion of the rapture begins in verse 50. After arguing that the Father is excepted from Jesus subduing all other power and authority, and demonstrating the absurdity of certain rituals if the dead are in fact not raised, and exposing the foolishness of incredulity concerning what kind of body people will have in the resurrection; Paul tells the Corinthians that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom. Some have urged this fact against certain premillennial positions because said positions allow that some non-glorified (i.e., flesh and blood) people who survive the tribulation would enter into the millennial kingdom. In response it may be noted that Paul has already discussed the kingdom up through Jesus turning it over to the Father. This would be the eternal state phase of the kingdom then that Paul is speaking of, not the millennial phase of the kingdom, when he says that flesh and blood cannot inherit it. There will be no non-glorified people in the eternal state.

This is exactly the difficulty though. What Paul has said so far concerning resurrections does not cover when the Corinthians, and everyone else who is a believer in this age, will be resurrected. In 1 Corinthians 15:51-58 Paul teaches about a resurrection of the dead believers of this age and a glorification of the surviving Christians at the time. Paul calls it a “mystery” and what he describes is an event that happens at once and out of the blue. The only thing that precedes it is a trumpet blast, but that hardly qualifies as the various elaborate signs that Jesus says would signal his return to establish the kingdom of God on earth (cf., Matt 24). The resurrection/glorification that the Corinthians will participate in had not been revealed in previous revelation. It was only after the resurrection of Christ that this mystery began to be revealed by the NT writers.

The timing element of the rapture here spoken of by Paul is not mentioned. It is in comparing the data found in this passage with others that it appears the rapture discussed by Paul here is a pre-tribulational one. I hold that conclusion lightly, as it is an inference that I make rather than a deduction made from what is explicitly taught in Scripture (e.g., the Trinity). At the same time I want to embrace all that may be understood from this passage because the totality of what the passage contains is motivation for following Paul’s admonition to the Corinthians:

So then, dear brothers and sisters, be firm. Do not be moved! Always be outstanding in the work of the Lord, knowing that your labor is not in vain in the Lord (1 Cor 15:58).

[1] Gentry, Kenneth L., “Postmillennialism,” in The Views on the Millennium and Beyond, ed. by Stanley N. Gundry (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1999), 48.

← Older posts

Authors

Recent Posts

  • Does the “slippery-slope” undermine the Holy Spirit?
  • Shepherds’ Conference and Serving . . . new year, same story
  • Thought of the day
  • Shawn goes viral!
  • Pastors: know and worship the Lord

Archives

  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012

Categories

  • Apologetics
  • Biblical Counseling
  • Biblical Theology
  • Bibliology
  • Book Review
  • Christology
  • Discipleship
  • Ecclesiology
  • Election
  • Eschatology
  • Evangelism
  • Gospel
  • Missions
  • pneumatology
  • Postmodernism
  • Preaching
  • Service
  • Shepherding
  • Systematic Theology
  • Teaching
  • Theodicy
  • Theology
  • Uncategorized
  • Worldview

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 15 other followers

Each author has exclusive rights to their written material. Please ask permission prior to use.

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Chateau by Ignacio Ricci.